Royalties & Contingent Income
How to Underwrite Litigation Finance
Underwrite litigation finance by estimating the probability of a favorable outcome, the likely recovery, the time to resolution and the defendant's ability to pay. Review merits with experienced counsel, model the litigation budget and the funding waterfall, and diversify across cases. Duration and collectability often matter as much as winning.
What makes litigation finance underwriting different
Litigation finance provides capital to claimants or law firms in exchange for a share of recoveries from lawsuits or arbitrations. What makes it distinct is that returns depend on legal outcomes and settlement dynamics rather than borrower credit. Value comes from strong claims with significant damages against solvent defendants. Risk comes from losing on the merits, lower damages than expected, long delays, appeals, rising legal costs and difficulty collecting judgments. Funding is usually non-recourse, so if the case loses, the funder loses its investment.
Funders underwrite each case on merits, damages, budget, duration and collectability, and build portfolios to reduce binary risk. Law firms seeking portfolio funding are underwritten on track record and the diversification of their caseload. Investors in litigation funds care about manager track record, case selection discipline and duration risk, since internal rates of return fall as cases drag on. Claimants weigh the cost of funding against keeping control of their case and avoiding legal expenses. Funders also weigh whether defendants have insurance that can fund a settlement.
Key metrics
Probability of success
The chance of a favorable outcome drives expected value.
Expected damages and recovery
Realistic recovery after settlement discounts and legal costs determines returns.
Duration to resolution
Longer cases reduce IRR even when outcomes are favorable.
Budget to damages ratio
The funded budget relative to potential damages shows return potential.
Funders often look for potential damages that are a large multiple of the funded budget.
Defendant collectability
A judgment is only valuable if the defendant can pay.
Return multiple and IRR
These measure funder returns under different outcomes.
How to underwrite it, step by step
- Review the claim, pleadings and key evidence.
- Have experienced counsel assess merits, defenses and procedural issues.
- Estimate damages and realistic settlement ranges.
- Model litigation budget, duration and appeal risk.
- Assess defendant collectability and enforcement options.
- Negotiate funding terms, return waterfall and control provisions.
- Monitor the case and budget through resolution.
Due diligence checklist
- Complaint and pleadings
- Key evidence and expert reports
- Counsel's case assessment
- Litigation budget
- Engagement letter and fee arrangement
- Damages analysis
- Defendant financial information
- Funding agreement
- Insurance policies such as after-the-event cover
- Conflict and ethics review
Key risks and mitigants
Loss on the merits
Rigorous legal review and portfolio diversification.
Case duration longer than expected
Model duration scenarios and use return terms that increase over time.
Budget overruns
Set budgets with contingencies and approval rights for overruns.
Defendant unable to pay
Assess collectability and enforcement before funding.
Regulatory and ethical issues
Review jurisdictional rules and ensure claimants retain control of litigation decisions.
Typical financing and deal structure
Litigation finance is typically non-recourse funding of legal fees and costs in exchange for a share of recoveries, often the greater of a multiple of capital deployed or a percentage of proceeds, with returns that may increase over time. Funders provide single-case funding, portfolio funding to law firms, or monetization of judgments and awards. Waterfalls set the order in which funders, lawyers and claimants are paid. Some deals use insurance to protect downside. Investors access the asset through litigation funds. Funders often negotiate information rights and budget approvals while leaving settlement decisions with the claimant. Judgment preservation insurance can protect a won verdict pending appeal.
Red flags
- Weak evidence or untested legal theories
- Defendant with questionable ability to pay
- Budget too large relative to damages
- Claimant or counsel unwilling to share key information
- Jurisdictions with uncertain enforcement or funding rules
Frequently asked questions
How does litigation finance work?
A funder provides money to pay legal fees and costs for a claim in exchange for a share of any recovery. Funding is usually non-recourse, so the funder receives nothing if the case loses. If the case succeeds or settles, the funder is repaid and receives an agreed return before or alongside the claimant.
How do funders evaluate cases?
Funders assess legal merits, damages, budget, duration and defendant collectability. They often use experienced litigators to review claims and model outcomes. Cases with strong evidence, large potential damages relative to costs and solvent defendants are most attractive. Many funders reject most cases they review. Counsel quality and fee alignment also weigh heavily.
What returns do litigation funders seek?
Returns are usually expressed as a multiple of capital deployed or a percentage of recoveries, often increasing over time. Funders target high returns to compensate for binary outcomes, long durations and the risk of losing invested capital. Time-based escalators protect the funder's IRR when cases run long.
Is litigation finance regulated?
Rules vary by jurisdiction. Some places restrict funding or require disclosure, while others allow it with few limits. Ethical rules for lawyers also affect arrangements. Funders review local regulations and ensure claimants keep control of litigation decisions. Some courts now require disclosure of funding arrangements.
Related terms
Underwrite a litigation finance deal in minutes
Drop a deck or data room. Underridge returns a verdict, investment memo, term sheet and a live model, with every headline figure traced to a page, a formula or a labeled assumption. Ten underwrites free.
Try Underridge freeEducational content, not investment, credit, legal or tax advice. Benchmarks are common practitioner rules of thumb and vary by lender, market and cycle.